THE
SCHOOL BOARD OF ALACHUA COUNTY, FLORIDA
APPROVED MINUTES OF REGULAR BOARD MEETING
April 6, 1999
The School Board of Alachua County, Florida, met in regular session duly called at 7 p.m. in the Boardroom, 620 East University Avenue, Gainesville, Florida. Present were: Bill Cake, chairman; Barbara Sharpe, vice-chairman; Judy Brashear, Bev Carroll, and Chester Leathers, members; Lawrence Marazza, superintendent; and James F. Lang, attorney for the Board.
The meeting was called to order by Chairman Cake, followed by the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag.
| APPROVAL OF MINUTES | Motion by Mrs.
Sharpe Seconded
by Mrs. Carroll Moved to approve the minutes of March 23, 1999, as presented. The question was called. Upon Vote: Motion passed 5-0 |
| ADOPTION OF AGENDA | Motion by Dr.
Leathers Seconded
by Mrs. Sharpe Moved to adopt the agenda for the meeting of April 6, 1999, as presented. Add Action item 1.c. (3) Student Case No. 99-24-X. Under Consent Agenda, Attachment D - Page 4, item O., change Food Service Equipment Large Wares (BID #99-43), from the General Fund to the Food Service Fund for R.W. Beaty Restaurant Equipment, in the amount of $15,457.98. The question was called on the agenda as amended. Upon Vote: Motion passed 5-0 |
| BOARD
MEMBERS/ SUPERINTENDENT ANNOUNCEMENTS |
Board members announced the
activities and events recently attended. Mrs. Brashear requested information on the total number of students zoned to Idylwild who elected to attend Elementary School E. She also requested that staff advertise the meeting to discuss interagency collaboration for use of recreational facilities scheduled for Wednesday, April 21, 1999, 8:30 a.m. in Conference Room E. Superintendent Marazza announced that Mrs. Sharpe was recently elected as Vice-President of the Florida School Boards Association. |
| RECOGNITIONTHE STATE FARM GOOD NEIGHBOR AWARD | A State Farm Insurance representative presented the Good Neighbor Award to Dr. Steven Noll, Special Education Teacher, Sidney Lanier Center. The award is designed to recognize significant innovation and leadership in elementary and secondary education and is in cooperation with the National Council for Social Studies. A $5,000 grant was also awarded to the Sidney Lanier Center. |
| CITIZEN INPUT | An education consultant urged the Board to address the issue of a full time lobbyist/negotiator position. It was also suggested the boards legislative platform for the upcoming 1999-2000 legislative session include a full-time position for charter schools to be funded out of general revenue. |
| NAMING ELEMENTARY SCHOOL "E" | Superintendent Marazza
reported that a committee of representatives from the
three elementary schools affected by the rezoning for the
new elementary school met to review the names submitted
for the new school and provided three possible names with
Lawton Elementary School as the unanimous choice and its
number one choice. Motion by Mrs. Sharpe Seconded by Mrs. Brashear Moved the superintendents recommendation to name the new elementary school Lawton M. Chiles Elementary School. Mrs. Brashear noted that the community also nominated former educators and community leaders Mrs. Sharpe thanked everyone for their suggestions and commended the committee for appropriately naming the new school after the late governor. Dr. Leathers stated he would support the recommendation, but preferred naming schools after local educators and citizens. Superintendent Marazza noted that a dedication ceremony will be scheduled in August. The question was called. Upon Vote: Motion passed 5-0 |
| PROPOSED
CHARTER SCHOOL CONTRACTS ********************** |
The regular Board meeting was recessed and a Public Hearing convened. |
| The president of the Alachua
County Education Association urged the Board not to allow
a private school to become a charter school. A citizen expressed support of the Expression Learning Arts Academy and its administrator. Mrs. Brashear stated that this district is on record as being very supportive of charter schools and the Board wants to support these schools in every way. She noted that the district does include arts and has always supported keeping the arts programs, even at times when it was difficult. She presented her concerns and requested the following assurances from the proposed charter schools:
Mrs. Brashear requested additional information on the current private religious school on the farm in Alachua prior to voting on the contract for the Alachua Learning Center, Inc., Charter School.
She requested additional information on the proposed Alachua Learning Center, Inc., Charter School.
She pointed out that the community defined in the The Alachua Learning Center, Inc., charter proposal is the students served by Alachua Elementary, which is all 3rd-5th graders in the City of Alachua and the larger environs of Alachua. The district currently provides K-8 schooling in the City of Alachua and the Alachua Learning Center is proposing to serve this same group of students. To her knowledge the schools in the Alachua area are not overcrowded and there is no curriculum that is going to be done in the new school that is not at least being addressed in the current schools. She requested staff contact the Department of Education for guidance to see if there are other similar cases around the state and what has happened to those charters that were either approved or rejected. She stated for the record that there is no particular item or legal technicality she finds to be amiss, but the intent of the charter school law is that a private or parochial school cannot become a charter. She also expressed serious concerns with the cost of monitoring this school to make sure they meet all requirements. Dr. Leathers expressed concern with the tremendous amount of staff time currently being needed to monitor charter schools. Mrs. Sharpe expressed that she has the same concerns as noted with the Alachua Learning Center, Inc., proposal and requested additional information dealing with the agricultural curriculum. She also requires assurances that this school is going to be nonsectarian and until her concerns are addressed, she will not support this charter school proposal. Mrs. Carroll stated that the Board supports charter schools, and she will be looking at charter schools that exhibit innovation, energy, and forms of accountability that this district has not yet used. The Alachua Learning Center, Inc., must address all the concerns expressed by the Board, specifically in the area of student achievement. Mrs. Sharpe requested a full report of the audit of the Chance Charter School, what is currently being done to correct the problem and a plan of action of what steps will be taken to resolve the problem. A supporter of charter schools commended the Board and expressed their support of the Expressions Learning Arts Academy. |
|
| PROPOSED SCHOOL HOURS | Several parents, students
and citizens addressed the Board in support of later
starting times for high school students and earlier
starting times for elementary students. Several research
studies and findings were presented, which indicate that
high school students require more sleep, which would
increase performance, reduce stress and improve high
school graduation rates. Mrs. Sharpe stated she could not support earlier starting times for elementary school students due to safety concerns. She can support what is equal for all students, but not one group if it penalizes others. Mrs. Brashear suggested the school improvement liaison assist in disseminating research information on sleep and later starting times for high school students to all school advisory council members and encourage a dialogue and innovation among school advisory councils on this topic. Dr. Leathers stated that he is open-minded about this issue. Mrs. Carroll stated that rural schools have the advantage, and she would like to see every school begin between 8 a.m. and 8:30 a.m. She noted that this issue impacts all students and requires additional research and community discussion. She encouraged school advisory councils to take a look at their schools and present a pilot program to the Board. Chairman Cake stated he cannot support switching elementary and high school starting times, however, he would be interested in seeing elementary schools continue on the same schedule and no school open prior to that time. High schools take the middle school slot and middle schoolers move back to 9:30 a.m., which would put middle schoolers home closer to when parents get home, which would solve problems for parents; high schools could help with athletes and student workers. He referred to the request by Prairie View to change its beginning time. Mrs. Brashear suggested Prairie View work with the school advisory council to change the school hours through its school improvement plan. Mrs. Brashear requested the superintendent and school advisory council liaison to facilitate change through the school improvement process and allow the variables to be discussed among school advisory councils and encourage them to present the Board with innovations it can support. Superintendent Marazza pointed out that school hours are closely tied to transportation, and the district works hard to utilize bus routes and get the maximum out of each route. He informed the Board that the district is looking at improving its bus route system by computerizing routes. Mr. Terry Tougaw, assistant superintendent, Facilities/Transportation, stated that the three city high schools are the ones affected by the 7:25 a.m. starting times and suggested a 10:00 a.m. or 10:15 a.m. starting time for the three city high schools. Mrs. Brashear suggested a letter be sent to the three city high schools encouraging their school advisory councils to review the research and present a pilot project to the Board. |
| ********************** | The Public Hearing was adjourned and the regular board meeting reconvened. |
| ALACHUA COUNTY VALUE ADJUSTMENT BOARD, 1999 | Motion by Dr.
Leathers Seconded
by Mrs. Brashear Moved to reappoint Mrs. Carroll and Mrs. Sharpe to the Value Adjustment Board, with Mrs. Brashear serving as alternate. The question was called. Upon Vote: Motion passed 5-0 |
| STUDENT
CASE NO. 99-22-X |
Mr. Tom Wittmer, staff
attorney, reported that the student is charged with
battery on another student, and defiance and battery on
school personnel. The parent did not request a hearing. Motion by Mrs. Sharpe Seconded by Mrs. Brashear Moved the superintendents recommendation to expel the student through the first semester of the 1999-2000 school year. The question was called. Upon Vote: Motion passed 5-0 |
| STUDENT
CASE NO. 99-23-X |
Mr. Wittmer reported that
the student is charged with possession, sale and transfer
of marijuana. The parent has requested a hearing. Motion by Mrs. Sharpe Seconded by Dr. Leathers Moved the superintendents recommendation to extend the students suspension through April 20, 1999. The question was called. Upon Vote: Motion passed 5-0 |
| STUDENT
CASE NO. 99-24-X |
Mr. Wittmer reported that
the student is charged with repeated use of abusive
language and disorderly conduct. A hearing was held Motion by Mrs. Sharpe Seconded by Mrs. Carroll Moved the superintendents recommendation to extend the students suspension through April 20, 1999. The question was called. Upon Vote: Motion passed 5-0 |
| PROPOSED REVISIONS TO POLICIESFIRST READING | Superintendent Marazza
informed the Board that the districts policies have
not had a comprehensive review since 1982. The MGT study
in 1996 recommended the Board enter into a contract for a
detailed analysis to purge outdated policies, eliminate
duplication of policies and assess the need for
new/revised policies. On January 22, 1997, the Board contracted with Educational Management Consultant Services (EMCS) for a comprehensive review and revision. The Board held two public workshops with EMCS June 24, 1997, and September 9, 1997. EMCS completed its work in January 1998. The Board also held a workshop on proposed policy changes on January 12, 1999. The proposed policies represent a complete overhaul of the existing policy manual. Motion by Mrs. Sharpe Seconded by Mrs. Brashear Moved the superintendents recommendation to approve the proposed revisions to the policies for advertising and schedule a public hearing for 7:30 p.m., May 4, 1999. The Board commended Mr. Wittmer for all his efforts. The question was called. Upon Vote: Motion passed 5-0 |
| REVISIONS TO POLICY BCFC, SCHOOL ADVISORY COUNCILSSECOND READING | A public hearing was held on
March 23, 1999, to consider revisions to Policy BCFC,
School Advisory Councils. Motion by Mrs. Brashear Seconded by Mrs. Carroll Moved the superintendents recommendation to adopt Policy BCFC, School Advisory Councils, as revised. The question was called. Upon Vote: Motion passed 5-0 |
| NEW/REVISED JOB DESCRIPTIONSSECOND READING | A public hearing was held
March 23, 1999, to consider new/revised job descriptions
that establish work responsibilities for career service
and professional/technical and administrative positions. Motion by Mrs. Sharpe Seconded by Mrs. Brashear Moved the superintendents recommendation to approve the new/revised job descriptions as presented. The question was called. Upon Vote: Motion passed 5-0 |
| APPROVE CRITERIA FOR BOARD MEMBERS ANNUAL EVALUATION OF SUPERINTENDENT | Chairman Cake noted that the
Board held workshops February 4, 1999, and March 2, 1999,
and developed a form to evaluate the superintendent. By
June 1 Board members will need to individually meet with
the superintendent and fill out this form with
recommendations for performance pay for action by June
30, 1999. Mrs. Brashear noted a minor change under the overall evaluation section of the form to include three blanks for an overall evaluation. Motion by Mrs. Brashear Seconded by Mrs. Carroll Moved to approve the criteria for Board Members Annual Evaluation of Superintendent. The question was called. Upon Vote: Motion passed 5-0 |
| CONSENT AGENDA | Motion by Mrs.
Sharpe Seconded
by Mrs. Brashear Moved to approve the Consent Agenda as described in items 1-23. (See Supplementary Minutes Book.) The question was called. Upon Vote: Motion passed 5-0 |
| ADJOURNMENT | The meeting was adjourned at 9:12 p.m. |